Lose out for better draft pick?

[JammerHammer23]

Originally Posted by JMelHo

Hell yes. I'm tired of not making the playoffs yet having middle of the pack draft picks. That gets you players like Larry English. Why not crack top 10 to have your pick of the litter.

Or a guy like Kerrigan......

A top 10 pick doesn't guarantee a great player.....

[RathMan1990]

Originally Posted by Kemp17

Seems that nearly everyone in this thread is missing an important distinction (probably because the thread title is poorly worded). If I understand correctly, the OP is saying that we should play our younger players more for the sake of development and seeing what we have, and if we did lose out he wouldn't necessary be super upset with that.

I would also like to see some younger players get some time (Mouton and Taylor in particular). But I don't think he was arguing that we ought to lose intentionally, which is indeed shameful.

^^^^^^This and only this I would support. ^^^^^^^

Losing out or losing on purpose for a higher pick is madness...

I originally posted a "lose for a better pick?" just to vent and for the heck of it after lastnights blunder somewhere around the CMB, but I was not entirely serious.

Thank god there are some people who still believes losing out is a BIG NO NO!

[mortalWombat]

10char.......

[Pink Parakeet]

Originally Posted by Kemp17

Seems that nearly everyone in this thread is missing an important distinction (probably because the thread title is poorly worded). If I understand correctly, the OP is saying that we should play our younger players more for the sake of development and seeing what we have, and if we did lose out he wouldn't necessary be super upset with that.

I would also like to see some younger players get some time (Mouton and Taylor in particular). But I don't think he was arguing that we ought to lose intentionally, which is indeed shameful.

Probably won't happen unless Norv was told that he'd return for sure next year. Mans gonna keep fighting for his job