|
![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
This one deserves its own thread.
Quote:
__________________
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
**** graham...that's all i have to say about that
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
When Graham gets his ass leveled by Ellison I'm going to laugh my ass off.
And typical Bronco crap just like their fans. There is a difference between dancing in excitement (jumping up and down fist pumping), and specifically making fun of a teams dance, while on their logo. They are such spin doctors.
__________________
Quote:
I hate the Broncos not because of their players, but because of their moronic fans. Quote:
Last edited by Bolt4Life; 11-22-2009 at 09:11 AM.. |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
It's good that Rivers has propelled the Chargers to being the chief rival of any team. I hate the DONKS the most out of the division and league and world.
__________________
THE OFFICIAL KING OF THE BHC![]() For my Father's will is that everyone who looks to the Son and believes in him shall have eternal life, and I will raise him up at the last day. John 6:40 |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Good find. Thanks for posting.
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Good read. No doubt theres a monster rivalry with Denver.
__________________
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
screw em, the donks used to be the dirtiest cheap shot chubs in the nfl. so screw em, hope we beat them every year for the next ten years
__________________
|
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Who's Daniel Graham?
__________________
Anyone using the "we" pronoun, not as a slip of grammar but a true belief that they were a part of something, is dealing with an alternate reality. WE didn't win jack crap. WE cheered for a team... - pacstud22 |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
yea really. who is daniel graham. he is a nobody in this league.
__________________
"Currently, the top five defenses in the NFL are a combined 44-21; the top five offenses are 56-9. the top five rushing teams are 37-28; the top five passing teams are 50-15." |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
So many errors and misconstrued notions in this article, as the author takes swipes at Rivers, LT, and even the Chargers as an organization that has from the Bronco's perspective only recently become "relevant."
What a joke! Consider John Bena's uninformed comment cited in the article: "The really old-school fans, they picked Kansas City, because that's the oldest rival. Then the older fans that grew up in the '70s-'80s-'90s, it's the Raiders. But for newer fans, from the Super Bowl years on, it's been the Chargers, because the Chargers have been relevant in that time." But here are the facts, folks, the Bronco's first AFC West Championship occurred in 1977. Denver repeated in 1978. The Chargers then won the next three AFC West Championships in 79, 80, 81. So in comparison to the Broncos, the Chargers were clearly a "relevant" AFC West team in the 70's and 80's and anyone who suggests that the Dan Fouts, Kellen Winslow, Charlie Joiner era was "irrelevant" doesn't know what the Hell they're talking about. Admittedly, there were some rough years that followed, but the Bolts did win the AFC West in 92 and 94. In contrast, the Broncos only won in 91, 96, and 98, which makes for one more AFC West title in the decade than the Bolts. That's it. One more championship than the Chargers in the 90's. So if the Chargers were irrelevant in terms of the AFC West during that decade, clearly, so were the Broncos. And as for this current decade, well, the Broncos have won the AFC West once compared to the Chargers four and clearly we're not done. So the article's point that the Chargers are a new rivalry because they have only recently become "relevant" amounts to simply a misconstrued attempt to strike out at the team who have this decade clearly turned the Broncos into their bicche! Last edited by Boltfan.nBoston; 11-28-2009 at 07:45 AM.. |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|