![]() |
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Line of Demarcation to Fire Norv Turner | |||
| Below .500, miss playoffs |
|
59 | 0.27% |
| .500 or above, miss playoffs |
|
89 | 0.40% |
| Make playoffs, go 0-1 in WC round |
|
29 | 0.13% |
| Make playoffs, go 0-1 in Div. round |
|
17 | 0.08% |
| Make playoffs, go 1-1 with loss in Div. round |
|
11 | 0.05% |
| Lose in AFCCG |
|
16 | 0.07% |
| Lose in SB |
|
7 | 0.03% |
| Win SB |
|
16 | 0.07% |
| Fire him now, season be damned! |
|
171 | 0.77% |
Never fire Norv, he's cuddly
|
|
21,663 | 98.12% |
| Voters: 22078. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
Quote:
Do you really beleive they would throw him under the bus in front of national media? Phillip Rivers, "I really dont want Norv back, uhhh nice guy, good technician but poor head coach..." Really? Yes, there have been twitter tirades, etc, etc... This has lead both the League and Teams to implament clear rules reagarding comments detramental to the organization. Its so obvious and cliche. I hope Aj/Norv proves me wrong but this is also the opinion of many around the league, "expert analysts" and other fans. |
|
||||
|
We had not just good, but GREAT drafts in the early to mid 2000's. We didn't just hit on some key #1 picks, we found value up and down the draft board. Our 2004 and 2005 drafts were absolutely stacked, and a big part of our core came from those drafts.
http://www.databasefootball.com/draf...?tm=SDG&lg=nfl But by now, all of those players have gotten much older in NFL years, and many are past their peak. Our recent drafts have produce much smaller returns, not only at the top but in overall depth as well. Part of it has been poor judgement, but also part of it is that nobody can consistently have drafts like 2004 and 2005 every year. So despite whatever mistakes or bad fortune has come our way (be it injuries, STD's, bad Hochuli calls or whatever), the decline in overall talent inevitably takes it toll on the results on the field. |
|
||||
|
It depends. If players were really cold on Norv, then you could probably read between the lines in their statements. But Rivers for example genuinely seemed to be stumping for Norv.
Quote:
|
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
||||
|
Quote:
Instead, PR (along with other players) went directly to Dean Spanos and lobbied for his return: Quote:
__________________
![]() You want analysis? Don't ask me: I'm just a Pollyanna lying idiotic know-nothing ball-watching stat boy.
Last edited by JoeMcRugby; 04-12-2012 at 12:28 PM.. |
|
|||
|
Quote:
Geez I can't let that go. Has any other team been flagged for that? |
|
|||
|
They shouldn't have to rally for their coaches job. That action alone says alot. Are we all mistaken? Who knows what really goes on behind closed doors.
Rivers and many other players have flourished under Norv, yet the team as a whole has clearly underachieved. Boneheaded mental errors, poor choices of staff, slow starts, injuries (lack of preporation/conditioning?) lack luster drafts, poor timing of contracts and cap space, all lead to management. Continuity was Spanos's buzz word all the while he makes changes left and right. |
|
|||
|
Not winning games when they really mattered.
|
|
||||
|
Quote:
If the players wanted Norv to be gone, all they had to do was not lobby for his return. Lobbying for his return is exactly what happened - and PR not only lobbied the owner, he also lobbied through the media: Quote:
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com...t-norv-turner/ Right or wrong, agree or disagree with their thought process, the players wanted Norv back. That's a fact.
__________________
![]() You want analysis? Don't ask me: I'm just a Pollyanna lying idiotic know-nothing ball-watching stat boy.
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|