Chargers Header
Forum Home News Media Vault Schedule Team Charger Girls Tickets Fan Zone Community En Espaņol Fantasy Football Pro Shop

Go Back   The Official Los Angeles Chargers Forum > Chargers Talk > Draft Talk
Register FAQ Members List Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 12-14-2016, 09:00 AM
pacstud's Avatar
pacstud pacstud is online now
Moderator of the Trenches
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Escondido
Posts: 20,016
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by topcat4477 View Post
Pac, this is the type of negative, defeatist attitude that characterizes losing teams. Instead of poking fun at our ideas for improving the Bolts, how about:

1. What QB can we get in rounds 4-7 that can, with proper training, give us our best chance to win after Rivers retires? Or even who may get PT even before Rivers retires? And before you laugh--just look at what Prescott has done subbing for Romo.

2. What coach can we get that will motivate our players, call plays that utilize the strengths of our players, send in the play on time, and manage games better than MM?

3. What SC coach can do a better job of helping our players to reduce the possiblilty of getting hurt?

4. What O-linemen can we get between rounds 2-4 that can, in time turn into solid starters? Who knows? Maybe one or two of them may start in year one, due to injury to a starter or poor starter play. Look how well Jatavis Brown did playing for Teo, and he's a 5th rounder. Never say never.

So, you're asking the wrong questions in a weak attempt at humor. Start asking the right questions instead of turning the argument into a false dichotomy.
Bull. And more bull. Your "look at Dak" is proof of your folly. No crap we can find a gem. Name him. I challenged you, you deferred. It's not a false dichotomy either, in fact it has nothing to do with that. Try latin, most people are too lazy to look it up.

Because GM's don't get the David Johnson/Tom Brady/Dak Prescott Navarro Bowman luxury. They don't get to wait and see, then pick.

So don't give me ten names and when one hits claim omniscience.

Give me one name, and a round. If he's not there, who's next. YOU draft. Then, when you miss, you're fired and your future opinions are moot. You're done. Once you miss, you're castigated as worthless.

Good luck, we're all counting on you.

And shame on you for acting like joking is less productive than whatever it is we're all doing here.
__________________
I love these calm little moments before the storm. It reminds me of Beethoven.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 12-14-2016, 09:01 AM
pacstud's Avatar
pacstud pacstud is online now
Moderator of the Trenches
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Escondido
Posts: 20,016
Default

And the fact you still think MM "sends in the plays" just verifies my evaluation of you.
__________________
I love these calm little moments before the storm. It reminds me of Beethoven.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 12-14-2016, 12:40 PM
Chargerfreak's Avatar
Chargerfreak Chargerfreak is online now
Power of 51
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Intersection of Vodka and Tonic
Posts: 27,740
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pacstud22 View Post
And the fact you still think MM "sends in the plays" just verifies my evaluation of you.
Wow. The Iron Fist has fallen.
__________________
The Empire Strikes Back


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 12-14-2016, 05:45 PM
pacstud's Avatar
pacstud pacstud is online now
Moderator of the Trenches
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Escondido
Posts: 20,016
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chargerfreak View Post
Wow. The Iron Fist has fallen.
Finals week, too much coffee...and let's face it...



The Iron Fist must be swung.
__________________
I love these calm little moments before the storm. It reminds me of Beethoven.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 12-14-2016, 07:10 PM
chargertom's Avatar
chargertom chargertom is offline
Bandwagon Homer Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Richfield
Posts: 72,186
Default

__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Los Angeles Super Chargers!
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 12-15-2016, 07:21 AM
topcat4477's Avatar
topcat4477 topcat4477 is online now
Hall of Famer
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Central Valley, Calif.
Posts: 5,801
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pacstud22 View Post
Give me one name, and a round. If he's not there, who's next. YOU draft. Then, when you miss, you're fired and your future opinions are moot. You're done. Once you miss, you're castigated as worthless.
Okay, I'll go with Mike Williams, WR, Clemson, round 1. As much as we need an OT, I think we can get better value in rounds 2-5 at tackle (see my mock). Williams gives us a deep threat, he's tall, and Rivers seems to have good chemistry with taller wideouts. Also, Williams would give us very good, quality depth at WR in case of injury. Okay, Pac, there's your name. You're up.

__________________
Okung - Wiggins - Slauson - Feeney - Barksdale
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 12-15-2016, 07:24 AM
frozendisc's Avatar
frozendisc frozendisc is online now
Hall of Famer
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Cotes-des-neiges, Montreal
Posts: 12,151
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by topcat4477 View Post
Okay, I'll go with Mike Williams, WR, Clemson, round 1. As much as we need an OT, I think we can get better value in rounds 2-5 at tackle (see my mock). Williams gives us a deep threat, he's tall, and Rivers seems to have good chemistry with taller wideouts. Also, Williams would give us very good, quality depth at WR in case of injury. Okay, Pac, there's your name. You're up.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ae1NERIpaAE
The OT's in your mock will not be available in the rounds you have them mocked at......
__________________
1909...the year excellence started.

GO BOLTS !
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 12-15-2016, 07:29 AM
topcat4477's Avatar
topcat4477 topcat4477 is online now
Hall of Famer
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Central Valley, Calif.
Posts: 5,801
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by frozendisc View Post
The OT's in your mock will not be available in the rounds you have them mocked at......
You could be right, Frozen, but as we get closer to draft day, I'll update. Ramczyk is projected anywhere from the end of round 1 to mid round 2, and McClinchey rounds 2-3, so not a stretch, but we'll see. Who would figure Keenan Allen would fall all the way out of round 1 to 3, even considering his injury? Who would figure Lael Collins would fall like a rock? Strange things have happened on draft day.
__________________
Okung - Wiggins - Slauson - Feeney - Barksdale
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 12-15-2016, 07:39 AM
I AMazing I's Avatar
I AMazing I I AMazing I is online now
LAme
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Dallas
Posts: 5,353
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by topcat4477 View Post
You could be right, Frozen, but as we get closer to draft day, I'll update. Ramczyk is projected anywhere from the end of round 1 to mid round 2, and McClinchey rounds 2-3, so not a stretch, but we'll see. Who would figure Keenan Allen would fall all the way out of round 1 to 3, even considering his injury? Who would figure Lael Collins would fall like a rock? Strange things have happened on draft day.
I think we're going to see Ramczyk shoot up draft boards. I've currently mocked him in the 1st in a trade down scenario, but I have a feeling that at the end of the day we may be talking about him at ~10 or wherever we're picking... if he's even around at that point.
__________________
2017 Live Mock

1. Malik Hooker, S
2. Forrest Lamp, OG
3. Tim Williams, Edge
4. Jake Butt, TE
5. Desmond King, CB/S
6. Stevie Tu'ikolovatu, NT
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 12-15-2016, 07:44 AM
frozendisc's Avatar
frozendisc frozendisc is online now
Hall of Famer
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Cotes-des-neiges, Montreal
Posts: 12,151
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by topcat4477 View Post
You could be right, Frozen, but as we get closer to draft day, I'll update. Ramczyk is projected anywhere from the end of round 1 to mid round 2, and McClinchey rounds 2-3, so not a stretch, but we'll see. Who would figure Keenan Allen would fall all the way out of round 1 to 3, even considering his injury? Who would figure Lael Collins would fall like a rock? Strange things have happened on draft day.
Yes, you are correct in pointing out that strange things happen. I am sensing this draft will be where teams are going o-line early and often, and by that I mean o-line players will go much earlier than what the pundits have them projected at. (the projections should evolve as the draft pundits talk with team sources I would guess) Ramczyk goes between 10-20, and McClinchey will be gone within five picks in the 2nd if he falls out of the 1st, which I kinda doubt.
__________________
1909...the year excellence started.

GO BOLTS !
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:45 AM.


© 2017 Los Angeles Chargers. All Rights Reserved.