Go Back   The Official Los Angeles Chargers Forum > Chargers Talk > Draft Talk
Register FAQ Members List Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #241  
Old 12-23-2012, 02:51 PM
Time4aRing's Avatar
Time4aRing Time4aRing is offline
Embrace the Sadness :'(
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: San Fernando Valley
Posts: 10,713
Default

If we lose, we are most likely looking at pick 8-10. If we win, we would be looking at 11-13.
__________________
Quote:
Mods, time4aRing needs a little timeout.
Follow me on Twitter:
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Reply With Quote
  #242  
Old 12-23-2012, 02:58 PM
JMelHo's Avatar
JMelHo JMelHo is offline
RIP Seau
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 2,834
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Time4aRing View Post
If we lose, we are most likely looking at pick 8-10. If we win, we would be looking at 11-13.
Crap. We will probably win because Norv's mediocrity descends at about one less win a year. I'm expecting us to be at 11-13. So we might as well throw out the hopes of Moore, Joeckel, Lotuleiei, Teo and maybe Milliner and now begin to look at Lewan, Fisher, Matthews, Warmack as legit possible draft prospects with wild cards like Johnathan Jenkins at NT or Banks at CB.

You have to love the way Norv loses, which screws this team in draft selection.
__________________

Reply With Quote
  #243  
Old 12-23-2012, 03:00 PM
chargersfan85's Avatar
chargersfan85 chargersfan85 is offline
Hall of Famer
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Marietta
Posts: 3,059
Default

I have feeling that we will be around that 13-16 range
Reply With Quote
  #244  
Old 12-23-2012, 03:05 PM
physicsgeek physicsgeek is offline
Hall of Famer
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: WHO DAT
Posts: 1,673
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chargersfan85 View Post
I have feeling that we will be around that 13-16 range
Most likely.

Sent from my Samsung Galaxy Note II using Tapatalk.
__________________
San Diego Chargers 2003-2017
New Orleans Saints 2017 -

Why the Saints?
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Reply With Quote
  #245  
Old 12-23-2012, 03:18 PM
Time4aRing's Avatar
Time4aRing Time4aRing is offline
Embrace the Sadness :'(
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: San Fernando Valley
Posts: 10,713
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chargersfan85 View Post
I have feeling that we will be around that 13-16 range
See here:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Time4aRing View Post
Cleveland and Arizona will both lose, and stay in their spots. Looking ahead to next week:

1. Kansas City Chiefs - 2-13 (.469 SOS)
2. Jacksonville Jaguars - 2-13 (.541 SOS)
3. Oakland Raiders - 4-11 (.469 SOS)
4. Philadelphia Eagles - 4-11 (.505 SOS)
5. Detroit Lions - 4-11 (.546 SOS)

6. Cleveland Browns - 5-9 (.480 SOS) vs Steelers
7. Buffalo Bills - 5-10 (.500 SOS) vs Jets
8. Tennessee Titans - 5-10 (.526 SOS) vs Jaguars
9. Arizona Cardinals - 5-9 (.543 SOS) vs 49ers
10. Tampa Bay Buccaneers - 6-9 (.469 SOS) vs Falcons

11. San Diego Chargers - 6-9 (.474 SOS) vs Raiders
12. New York Jets - 6-9 (.526 SOS) vs Bills
13. Carolina Panthers - 6-9 (.536 SOS) vs Saints

6-13 is our new range. We want Bills to beat the Jets. We want Browns to beat Steelers. Titans should beat Jaguars. Those are are possible, we would be looking at pick 8. The Cardinals and Buccaneers are going to lose most likely, so we won't see pick 6 or 7. Panthers and Jets even if they lose will finish behind us if we lose to Oakland due to SOS.
14. Miami Dolphins - 7-8 (.500 SOS) vs Patriots
15. New Orleans Saints - 7-8 (.528 SOS) vs Panthers
16. St. Louis Rams - 7-7-1 (.536 SOS) vs Seahawks
17. Pittsburgh Steelers - 7-8 (.469 SOS) vs Browns

If all 4 of these teams lose, and we win, record wise we will be the same, but we will have a weaker SOS than all 4. (Pitt played Cinci, we played Jets). So 6-13 is our range.
__________________
Quote:
Mods, time4aRing needs a little timeout.
Follow me on Twitter:
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Reply With Quote
  #246  
Old 12-23-2012, 03:25 PM
JMelHo's Avatar
JMelHo JMelHo is offline
RIP Seau
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 2,834
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Time4aRing View Post
See here:

14. Miami Dolphins - 7-8 (.500 SOS) vs Patriots
15. New Orleans Saints - 7-8 (.528 SOS) vs Panthers
16. St. Louis Rams - 7-7-1 (.536 SOS) vs Seahawks
17. Pittsburgh Steelers - 7-8 (.469 SOS) vs Browns

If all 4 of these teams lose, and we win, record wise we will be the same, but we will have a weaker SOS than all 4. (Pitt played Cinci, we played Jets). So 6-13 is our range.
There is a good chance we beat Oakland though. They are terrible and this team is semi healthy again.
__________________

Reply With Quote
  #247  
Old 12-23-2012, 03:33 PM
Time4aRing's Avatar
Time4aRing Time4aRing is offline
Embrace the Sadness :'(
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: San Fernando Valley
Posts: 10,713
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JMelHo View Post
There is a good chance we beat Oakland though. They are terrible and this team is semi healthy again.
If we do, and BUF,CAR, NYJ all lose, than we will pick 13th per SOS predictions. There's a shot that one or two of those teams win as well.
__________________
Quote:
Mods, time4aRing needs a little timeout.
Follow me on Twitter:
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Reply With Quote
  #248  
Old 12-23-2012, 04:37 PM
meatbucket's Avatar
meatbucket meatbucket is offline
Vegeterian Veteran
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: no cal
Posts: 1,572
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JMelHo View Post
Well Tampa looks to be giving up on their coach. Maybe the Chargers should follow suit.
looks like both the chargers and VJ ended up in the same place (6-9). wonder what might have been had we offered a contract to vincent instead of mcneil! hopefully that will be the deciding factor in the dismissal of smith.
Reply With Quote
  #249  
Old 12-23-2012, 04:56 PM
HeadTrip's Avatar
HeadTrip HeadTrip is offline
Hall of Famer
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Auburn
Posts: 17,688
Default

I really think Lewan is going to be the pick no matter how this plays out. What's everyone think about Ansah vs Lewan vs Warmack?
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Reply With Quote
  #250  
Old 12-23-2012, 04:58 PM
chargersfan85's Avatar
chargersfan85 chargersfan85 is offline
Hall of Famer
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Marietta
Posts: 3,059
Default

I hope we get Matthews I wanted him anyways and it makes more sense to take him at 13-16 than at 6
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:38 PM.


© 2018 Los Angeles Chargers. All Rights Reserved.